Search for: "Gay v. Horton"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 4:30 am
Horton represents a "gay-rights block buster. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:22 am
Horton from the perspective of the gay rights/gay marriage issue. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:44 pm
On page one of the article, Attorneys Horton and Bartschi take a very educated guess that Kerrigan v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:42 am
The California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Horton v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:04 pm
V. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:49 pm
Horton v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:47 am
Yesterday's ruling by the California Supreme Court in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:53 am
In Strauss v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:28 am
Horton and Perry. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
Horton, 46 Cal.4th 364]. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:19 am
Horton, 46 Cal.4th 364 (2009), but Yes on 8 publicly opposed its intervention. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Until June 6th, Bishop et al v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:45 am
Horton. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
Adler) On Thursday, Judge Vaughn Walker denied gay marraige opponents’ motion for a stay of his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:22 am
" In Strauss v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Horton, that the state has a duty to treat gay and straight same-sex couples equally with respect to the rights and duties of marriage, even though same-sex couples can not obtain marriage licenses. [read post]
